On Efficiency, and Water
The 8th of August is Peasant's Day here in Tanzania, also referred to in some places as Farmer's Day (a conflation which would upset Marx and Engels perhaps, but is apt in the context of farming that is predominantly for subsistence), and so i thought it would be an appropriate moment to address this issue, which has been on my mind.
Much is made these days of the fact that barriers to trade, tariffs and taxes of various kinds are economically inefficient. Efficiency seems to be the raison d'etre of many Western and conservative ('neoclassical') economists. Their focus, however, is on things like government 'interference' in the economy, corruption (especially in the context of developing country governments), the informal sector [last year a consulting company released a report arguing that the informal sector's inefficiency is harmful to the economies of developing countries - ignoring the fact that it's this very inefficiency that allows it to absorb so much labour] and barriers to trade in goods and currencies.
But if we're going to be concerned with inefficiencies, which as it happens i think we should, then it seems the above list is critically incomplete. I've only been travelling for a month now, but i have been struck the large number of individuals spending inordinate amounts of time and effort simply collecting water. In some areas this involves cycling (and perhaps walking) a round trip of up to 40kilometres, with as much as 30kg's of water on the return trip.
Now, i have little doubt that if we measured the costs of various inefficiencies by their cost to global GDP in monetary value, then the inefficiencies listed previously will vastly outweigh that of tiem spent by people who would otherwise by engaged in subsistence farming or piece-meal work. But what if one used an alternative measure? What if we valued these people's time - never mind their energy - by the world's GDP per capita? After all, only a racial, cultural or geographical supremacist would claim that individuals' in richer countries are rich for reasons other than the socio-economic context into which they were born [which is not to say that something like culture does not play a critical role in economic well-being, just that not individual can, as an individual, take the credit for this]. If this were done, then the value of this time lost due to the inefficiency that results from a lack of piped, clean (most locals in urban areas boil tap water before drinking it - vastly inefficient compared to a working, centralised water treatment plant) water was calculated, i suspect it would rank fairly high on the afore-mentioned list.
There is nothing wholly new in this argument, but it is perhaps a more hard-nosed way of looking at it than just saying that it's 'not fair' for some people to have access to piped water and sanitation and others not.
Something to think about when you turn on your taps today
Labels: TRIP
